Exec and non-exec boards can be great places for learning, sharing and building something together with peers. Often the Treasurer is presenting to these groups, but sometimes it can be challenging in terms of dynamics. If caught up in that ‘traditional’, aggressive corporate boardroom, what can you do?
The days of aggression in the boardroom are not over and particularly, in some business sectors, the tone of the conversation can be ‘deeply unpleasant’, as someone reflected to me recently. The situation and challenges may be accurate and reasonable in themselves, but the delivery of the message at times is not only inappropriate, but can be counter-productive. Research shows that many people do not perform at their best as a result, feeling as if they are on trial, and therefore experiencing fear and confusion, which undermines them. Alternatively, very much related to fear again, due to self-preservation they consciously act to please in future and therefore do not ever really exercise their full potential.
Research also shows that an aggressive culture at the top cascades through the organisation and people learn the same kinds of behaviours in the belief it will allow them to survive. I remember a time when I headed up the finances for a $23bn global organisation, where the CEO was known to throw people’s phones out the window and such similar nonsense. To be asked to work in the head office, I learnt, was something most people feared.
Treasurers can often be faced with this kind of culture, and it can be very debilitating for some, if they do not have a CFO who has their back. Others ‘learn’ and, as per the research, start to adopt the same kinds of behaviours with others. It’s an interesting phenomenon, and reminds me a little of the theory that a boss who micromanages demonstrates that their partner probably micromanages them at home. They simply transfer what they cannot control at home, into the workplace.
So what advice can a treasurer take when caught up in this dilemma (assuming they don’t really want to adopt such out-moded and unpleasant attitudes themselves)? I would suggest the following:
And as a final word of advice: when looking at a new role in a new organisation, do your due diligence, and really try to find out what the board(s) culture is, and what you might have to deal with. If the best treasurers retain their integrity and only work for those organisations that behave in a respectful and professional manner, then the others will be forced to change over time.
Read the full blog on the ACT website here
Caroline Stockmann, Chief Executive, ACT
Centralized treasury management optimizes efficiency, mitigates financial risks, and enhances liquidity control, despite complexities, costs, and tax risks, offering substantial long-term benefits through streamlined operations and strategic coherence.
ReadWe can accept the idea that not finding a banker is a major financial risk. However, more than ever, François Masquelier believes the banking relationship has become a risk to be managed like any other, with tact, efficiency, and moderation.
ReadAlexandros Koliavras (HAT) sits down with Europe's 'Father of Treasury', ATEL President and EACT Chair, Francois Masquelier.
ReadThe Slovak Association of Finance and Treasury and the Czech Treasury Association jointly held a discussion webinar with the goal of sharing experiences of the EuroFinance treasury conference in Copenhagen on October 24, 2024.
ReadAfter a record attendance to the 2023 AFTE days, AFTE expect over 1,800 attendees to the upcoming edition that will take place on 25 and 26 November. For 2024, AFTE thought big and chose a new, larger venue at the CNIT Paris La Défense.
Read