The regulated financial services sector is familiar with liquidity management and planning under normal and stressed environments, but for most other corporate treasury functions it is not an area that often merits any structure or guidance.
We have seen a fundamental shift in the liquidity markets over past couple of weeks and while the change has been sudden, it will have long lasting implications for how corporate treasuries think about their liquidity strategy. During these extraordinary times, it is helpful to consider some of the approaches adopted by those working in banks, insurers and asset managers.
Banks have to manage to minimum liquidity requirements, as detailed in Basel frameworks, and provide regular reporting on these metrics to their regulators. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (“LCR”) is one of the two key metrics (the other being the Net Stable Funding Ratio). It is designed to ensure that banks hold a sufficient liquidity buffer – defined as a reserve of high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) to allow them to survive a period of significant liquidity stress lasting 30 days. The period is selected as the minimum period for corrective action to be taken by management.
The LCR liquidity stress scenario is prescriptive and based on assuming:
Banks also undertake reverse stress testing which looks at the various scenarios that would need to arise for the firm to cease to be able to pay out on its obligations. This may include sale of assets at distressed prices, accelerated outflows and delays in liquidating certain assets.
Adopting a structured approach in developing a forward-looking liquidity risk view is key. There are three key focus areas which will input into the model:
There are several models that one can adopt to determine liquidity requirements, but the following three-step approach may be effective across a range of businesses and circumstances.
Estimate Liquidity Requirements
Undertake scenario analysis
Explore all your funding options
Thanks to Nick Burge and Harsh Gambani from Standard Chartered Bank for their assistance with this article.
Naresh Aggarwal
Associate Director – Policy and Technical
ACT
To change EMIR refit would be to take three steps backwards after having taken three steps forwards. Let's not be fooled by good idea at first sight.
ReadEuropean treasurers are concerned by the PSD2 review, as well as by the regulations on instant payments. We believe that it is necessary to promote any means to verify that the holder of a beneficiary account is the one to whom this account belongs.
Read1300 people from across the treasury community gathered to enjoy an evening of community and fundraising.
ReadAt the end of October around 260 members and guests joined in the Palmengarten in Frankfurt to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the VDT.
ReadAFTE held its annual conference on 15-16 November 2022 at the Palais Brongniart, the former stock exchange building in the heart of Paris.
Read