The Real Impact of Derivatives Regulation: Time to Challenge ESMA with the Realities?

by Richard Raeburn, EACT Chairman. ESMA invited comments on the technical standards for reporting under article 9 of EMIR. I sense that amongst corporate practitioners there is a profound sense of weariness - a weariness borne not just out of the volume of work created for them but also the sheer frustration of dealing with the uncertainties and inconsistencies that dog the implementation of at least the trade reporting aspects of EMIR. That volume of work is incidentally (and in my view) contributing neither to the greater good of treasurers, their employing organisations nor I suspect regulators. But the EACT does not allow itself to become weary and in our response to ESMA we make two fundamental points: that there should be sufficient lead time to implement future changes in reporting requirements; and that reporting should be focused on areas of increased inherent risk and exclude transactions that are not systemically risky. On the first point we highlight the problems caused by the rule changes and adaptations that are still being made. We argue for a stop to future large scale reporting changes, for proper time to allow trade repositories to test enhancements etc. We also stress that new reporting requirements should apply only to new transactions and not to those previously reported but not reconciled. For the second point we return to the core issue of the need for an EU wide exemption of intragroup transactions and for clarification of the scope of an FX derivative to exclude FX contracts used for commercial/hedging purposes by corporates. The elephant in the room here is of course the question as to whether the panoply of derivatives regulation as applied to corporates (ESMA's non-financial counterparties) is actually contributing to a reduction in systemic risk linked to the financial sector. Since the beginning of the regulatory tsunami in 2009 I have argued that the proposals for derivatives were fundamentally misguided to the extent that civil servants, politicians and regulators believed that the corporate sector is a real source of systemic risk. All of which brings us to EMIR v2. I'm sure there will eventually be an EMIR v2 even though it is already behind schedule. The EACT's shopping list will include the exclusion of intragroup transactions, a switch to one-sided reporting and above all a better coordinated and consistent global approach. One can only dream.

View Document

News


Vision on financial regulation for the real economy for the next 5 years

Photo from Vision on financial regulation for the real economy for the next 5 years

Corporate treasurers are financial specialists within non-financial companies - but as end-users they are often impacted by EU legislation aimed at the financial sector.

View More

EACT Newsletter - June 2019

Photo from EACT Newsletter - June 2019

The latest issue features articles on the European Parliament elections, the trade war between China and the USA, bank account management in transition plus the news that Helmut Schnabel has been re-elected Chair of IGTA.

View More

EACT Newsletter - April 2019

Photo from EACT Newsletter - April 2019

The latest issue features articles on cryptocurrencies in the Czech financial market, cybersecurity, impacts of M&A on hedging operations and much more.

View More

EACT Newsletter - March 2019

Photo from EACT Newsletter - March 2019

The newsletter features a series of special reports on the EACT Summit 2019.

View More

EACT Briefing Focus: KYC

Photo from EACT Briefing Focus: KYC

KYC has become a serious concern for EACT members over recent years: it is increasingly complex to fulfil all unstructured and nonharmonized requests. In all recent surveys, KYC is listed as a top priority for corporates and its rising costs are a source of frustration.

View More