The Real Impact of Derivatives Regulation: Time to Challenge ESMA with the Realities?

by Richard Raeburn, EACT Chairman. ESMA invited comments on the technical standards for reporting under article 9 of EMIR. I sense that amongst corporate practitioners there is a profound sense of weariness - a weariness borne not just out of the volume of work created for them but also the sheer frustration of dealing with the uncertainties and inconsistencies that dog the implementation of at least the trade reporting aspects of EMIR. That volume of work is incidentally (and in my view) contributing neither to the greater good of treasurers, their employing organisations nor I suspect regulators. But the EACT does not allow itself to become weary and in our response to ESMA we make two fundamental points: that there should be sufficient lead time to implement future changes in reporting requirements; and that reporting should be focused on areas of increased inherent risk and exclude transactions that are not systemically risky. On the first point we highlight the problems caused by the rule changes and adaptations that are still being made. We argue for a stop to future large scale reporting changes, for proper time to allow trade repositories to test enhancements etc. We also stress that new reporting requirements should apply only to new transactions and not to those previously reported but not reconciled. For the second point we return to the core issue of the need for an EU wide exemption of intragroup transactions and for clarification of the scope of an FX derivative to exclude FX contracts used for commercial/hedging purposes by corporates. The elephant in the room here is of course the question as to whether the panoply of derivatives regulation as applied to corporates (ESMA's non-financial counterparties) is actually contributing to a reduction in systemic risk linked to the financial sector. Since the beginning of the regulatory tsunami in 2009 I have argued that the proposals for derivatives were fundamentally misguided to the extent that civil servants, politicians and regulators believed that the corporate sector is a real source of systemic risk. All of which brings us to EMIR v2. I'm sure there will eventually be an EMIR v2 even though it is already behind schedule. The EACT's shopping list will include the exclusion of intragroup transactions, a switch to one-sided reporting and above all a better coordinated and consistent global approach. One can only dream.

View Document

Subscribe to the EACT Newsletter

News


Podcast | Digitisation in a Post-Covid Environment

Photo from Podcast | Digitisation in a Post-Covid Environment

Today, treasurers and their systems vendors and banks, are taking a longer term, more strategic approach to digitisation, automation and data.

View More

EACT in Action: KYC Webinar and EACT Awards

Photo from EACT in Action: KYC Webinar and EACT Awards

Join us on June 24th to find out how to streamline and digitise customer-reference data and due diligence processes in treasury applications, and discover who will receive this year’s EACT Award!

View More

Podcast | Trends in Corporate Treasury 2021

Photo from Podcast | Trends in Corporate Treasury 2021

A panel of experts preview the results of two major studies for 2021 undertaken by the EACT and PwC respectively, to understand the trends in corporate treasury as we transition into a post-pandemic environment.

View More

EACT Newsletter - March 2021

Photo from EACT Newsletter - March 2021

The latest edition contains the European financial market regulatory round-up, a roundtable with GLEIF on the use of the LEI in treasury, and more information about the 2021 EACT Award

View More

Podcast | Central Bank Digital Currencies: What Treasurers Need to Know

Photo from Podcast | Central Bank Digital Currencies: What Treasurers Need to Know

Jean-Marc Servat, EACT, takes a deep dive into the world of crypto assets to discuss why Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are capturing the attention of finance professionals.

View More